Executive TL;DR:
- Bambu Studio’s use of bambu_networking raises concerns about AGPL compliance.
- Forum voices argue over the interpretation of AGPL rules.
- The debate centers on the use of proprietary libraries in AGPL-licensed code.
The Buzz Score
The Internet’s Verdict: 60% Concerned, 40% Defensive
Forum Discussion
Users are discussing the implications of Bambu Studio’s use of bambu_networking.
It looks like generated by ‘AI’, so I recommend taking a dose of scepticism before reading.
Others argue that AGPL-licensed code can consume proprietary libraries.
it is okay for agpl3 app to consume propietary library , not the opposite that derived code must be same viral license
Technical Implications
Some users point out the potential consequences of this interpretation.
This interpretation would mean that you could not produce AGPL licensed code which loads some code in dynamically. Like say you couldn’t have an AGPL licensed web-browser which sometimes loads pages whose JavaScript’s source-code is obscured.
Focus Keyword: AGPL Violation
