Executive Summary
- Antigravity 2.0 tops the OpenSCAD Architectural 3D LLM Benchmark.
- Users report impressive results with Antigravity in various applications.
- Some users express concerns about the rollout and performance of Antigravity.
The Buzz Score
The Internet’s Verdict: 70% Hyped, 30% Skeptical
User Experiences
Users are sharing their experiences with Antigravity 2.0, with some achieving impressive results.
Last weekend I bought my wife a bike off marketplace. It was in good condition but was missing one of the internal cable routing grommets. I gave Claude pictures of the pill-shaped hole by itself and with my digital calipers in the long and short directions. Gave it a short prompt and it gave me an openscad model with everything parametrized.
Concerns and Comparisons
Some users express concerns about the rollout and performance of Antigravity.
Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but: My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won’t update at all, so: If it’s ok I’d prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything.
Others compare Antigravity to existing solutions.
Still a long way from shorting Autodesk. As a side note Autodesk released an agentic assistant back in December for Fusion. Six months later it is still quite bad.
Focus Keyword: Antigravity 2.0
